Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
en:tech:software-reviews:software_we_use [2019/02/24 12:17]
encosianima_riseup.net [Software we analysed:]
en:tech:software-reviews:software_we_use [2019/03/30 17:46] (current)
encosianima_riseup.net [Software used within the ecosystem, update to march 2019:]
Line 1: Line 1:
-# Analysis of Software ​tools used in FairCOOP+# Analysis of tools used in FairCOOP
  
-This report aims to better understand the tools used within the ecosystem with their characteristics,​ advantages and disadvantages.+(2018)This report aims to better understand the tools used within the ecosystem with their characteristics,​ advantages and disadvantages. If any of these tools is demonstrated to be essential, in my opinion (Al-Demon) we should enable a version of their own and controlled by the Tech Assembly without using external services.
  
-If any of these tools is demonstrated to be essentialin my opinion ​(Al-Demonwe should enable a version of their own and controlled by the Tech Assembly without using external ​services.+(2019) An upgrade ​of the previous situation ​is taking placeheading to a distributed system ​(still in progress), decentralising ​Tech assembly functions in order to allow hardware, software and humanware to get along well together and optimize ​services ​and developing.
  
-## How the analysis report was performed (from late 2017 to beginning on 2018) 
-Value numbers representing quality and good practices related to software are assigned next to the domain (in report?)... bear in mind that this analysis is extremely experimental and needs to improve both in methodology than in documentation. 
  
-## Software ​analysed:+ 
 + 
 +### Software ​used within the ecosystem, update to march 2019:
   - [[Drupal]] No more used   - [[Drupal]] No more used
-  - [[Wordpress]] Still used +  - [[Wordpress]] Still used freedomcoop.eu,​ getfaircoin,​ ufc 
-  - [[Odoo]] in FM version ​12 is used +  - [[Odoo]] in FM version ​is used, planning update to 10 or 12  
-  - [[HTML5]] ​no comment :-D+  - [[HTML5]] ​that's not a software, it's a MU language, in any case, used
   - [[Telegram]] still used, despite once in a while someone comes with great ideas regarding alternative   - [[Telegram]] still used, despite once in a while someone comes with great ideas regarding alternative
-  - [[RocketChat]] not fully implemented though used, some Telegram group are bridged to Fairchat +  - [[RocketChat]] not fully implemented though used, some Telegram group are bridged to Fairchat ​(fairkom rocketchat) 
-  - [[Discourse]] used+  - [[Discourse]] used in Forum
   - [[Nextcloud]] used, together with owncloud, descentralised in fairkom   - [[Nextcloud]] used, together with owncloud, descentralised in fairkom
   - [[Etherpad]] descentralised in fairkom   - [[Etherpad]] descentralised in fairkom
   - [[Ethercalc]] descentralised in fairkom   - [[Ethercalc]] descentralised in fairkom
-  - [[Wekan]] ​+  - [[Wekan]] ​ ​descentralised in fairkom
   - [[Webcalendar]] descentralised in fairkom   - [[Webcalendar]] descentralised in fairkom
   - [[ValueNetwork]] used as Agent and Shroom   - [[ValueNetwork]] used as Agent and Shroom
-  - [[Mumble]] +  - [[Mumble]] ​(my personal experience (encosianima) is that it doesn'​t work with more than 5 ppl so that luckly NEVER USED 
-  - [[KeyCloak]] +  - [[KeyCloak]] ​another identity access manager, NEVER USED 
-  - [[Yacy]] +  - [[Yacy]] ​a search engine still searching out its space in Fair.coop NEVER USED 
-  - [[Storj]] +  - [[Storj]] ​a nice and decentralised story, potencially,​ but sadly never happened NEVER USED 
-  - [[LXD Server]] +  - [[LXD Server]] ​Roundcube (e-mail client) opens when hitting srv01.fair.coop,​ fact that makes me infer LXD not in use 
-  - [[ERPnext]] used as Shroom roots ( even though ​mushrooms have spores, not roots :) +  - [[ERPnext]] used as Shroom roots ( even if mushrooms have spores, not roots :) 
-  - [[OpenProject]] ​+  - [[OpenProject]] ​another project manager NEVER USED
  
-NB, a category to evaluate electric consumption is missing,we just couldn'​t gather enough information.+## Ideal methodology
  
-Try to explain points:+NB, a category ​to evaluate electric consumption is missing, we just couldn'​t gather enough information. 
 + 
 +Fields to be completed:
 - SOFTWARE: [ Name of installed software ] - SOFTWARE: [ Name of installed software ]
   - UPDATE: [ If is update the software and when ]   - UPDATE: [ If is update the software and when ]
Line 45: Line 47:
   - CONTROL VERSION: [ If we have a control system with almost 3 versions develop-testing-production ]   - CONTROL VERSION: [ If we have a control system with almost 3 versions develop-testing-production ]
  
- +NB 
-- - - +Value numbers representing quality and good practices related to software are assigned next to the domain (where? in the report?)... bear in mind that this analysis is extremely experimental and needs to improve both in methodology than in documentation. 
 +  
 +### Further analysis 
 + ​[[/​en:​tech:​software-analysis]]