Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
en:tech:fairhackathon_2019_aspects [2019/06/01 14:41] zumbrunn |
en:tech:fairhackathon_2019_aspects [2019/06/01 21:39] (current) zumbrunn [Concerns] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
| - Consumerism, surveillance and blaming attitude of some people, instead of helping actively | - Consumerism, surveillance and blaming attitude of some people, instead of helping actively | ||
| - FairEconomy onion is undefined and the onion layers lack defined meaning | - FairEconomy onion is undefined and the onion layers lack defined meaning | ||
| - | - We have value flows that are not visible in the value network (FairMarket, UseFairCoin --> OCP) | + | - We have value flows that are not visible in the value network (FairMarket, UseFairCoin in OCP) |
| - No current consensus on the value of FairCoin | - No current consensus on the value of FairCoin | ||
| Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
| ==== Questions ==== | ==== Questions ==== | ||
| - | + | - When is money a good tool? | |
| - | * When is money a good tool? | + | - How do we make tools more used and usable, user orientated? |
| - | * How do we make tools more used and usable, user orientated? | + | - Which tools do we (really) need and in which order/priority? |
| - | * Which tools do we (really) need and in which order/priority? | + | - How to most efficiently connect offers and needs in the permFairEco? |
| - | * How to most efficiently connect offers and needs in the permFairEco? | + | - Is FairCoop the core of the onion or the whole onion, accepting that people are at the layer where they are? |
| - | * Is FairCoop the core of the onion or the whole onion, accepting that people are at the layer where they are? | + | - How do we make FairCoop "productive" in the sense that we can provide for a good livelihood? |
| - | * How do we make FairCoop "productive" in the sense that we can provide for a good livelihood? | + | |
| ==== Solutions ==== | ==== Solutions ==== | ||
| + | - Fair satellite projects that contract contributors in the fair value network | ||
| + | - Fair satellites should be able to make shallower and deeper use of OCP | ||
| + | - Team and/or website that would function as sales for this "ecosystem as a service" | ||
| + | - Upvote / downvote for prioritisation, in the spirit of governance, see "Good 13" | ||
| + | - Develop FairAcademy to improve FairSkills in the ecosystem | ||
| + | - Workshop on video tutorial production later in the hackathon | ||
| + | - We need a good sysadmin team and clean hosting infrastructure | ||
| + | - Open calls for mentoring, onboarding to develop and maintain apps | ||
| + | - More direct bounties again for achieving milestones | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Concerns ==== | ||
| + | - Complexity of OCP, unfinishedness | ||
| + | - How to prevent tasks from being taken without delivering on time (means tasks need to be small enough) | ||
| + | - How do we best balance the freedom to choose what to work on and the coordination for priorities for the common good | ||
| + | - Risk sensitivity of OCP due to transacting directly on the blockchain | ||
| + | - How can we trust the fairness of current and future FairCoin accumulation | ||
| + | - Need to update OCP to Python 3 | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Inventory ==== | ||
| + | - Global community of like-minded people | ||
| + | - Open software and people that can put it to use | ||
| + | - Intersection of our different independent projects, leveraging synergies | ||
| + | - There are a lot of FairCoins around that could be spent, invested into fair economy projects as long as they would not end up getting exchanged to fiat | ||
| + | |||
| - | * Fair satellite projects that contract contributors in the fair value network | ||
| - | * Fair satellites should be able to make shallower and deeper use of OCP | ||
| - | * Team and/or website that would function as sales for this "ecosystem as a service" | ||
| - | * Upvote / downvote for prioritisation, in the spirit of governance, good | ||
