Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
en:tech:fairhackathon_2019_aspects [2019/06/01 09:43]
zumbrunn
en:tech:fairhackathon_2019_aspects [2019/06/01 21:39] (current)
zumbrunn [Concerns]
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 ==== Good ("​horizon"​) ==== ==== Good ("​horizon"​) ====
- +  - Regenerative,​ sustainable behaviour  
-Regenerative,​ sustainable behaviour  +  ​- ​Cooperative (vs competitive) 
-Cooperative (vs competitive) +  ​- ​Open source spirit 
-Open source spirit +  ​- ​Permacircular fair economy 
-Permacircular fair economy +  ​- ​"Money is Time" (vs time is money) 
-"Money is Time" (vs time is money) +  ​- ​Bottom up economic model that is addressing needs, is based on needs of people 
-Bottom up economic model that is addressing needs, is based on needs of people +  ​- ​Educated, aware society 
-Educated, aware society +  ​- ​Organic growth 
-Organic growth +  ​- ​Worker coops, platform coops 
-Worker coops, platform coops +  ​- ​shared, clear horizon 
-shared, clear horizon +  ​- ​We work in groups, not individual, and with shared intensions, not commitment 
-We work in groups, not individual, and with shared intensions, not commitment +  ​- ​Free of Theft 
-Free of Theft +  ​- ​Governance for awareness of consciousness (not to create laws) 
-Governance for awareness of consciousness (not to create laws) +  ​- ​No order following, act requiring full information,​ transparency and understanding as a precondition 
-No order following, act requiring full information,​ transparency and understanding as a precondition +  ​- ​Exchange back to unfair money needs to be fair (transparency,​ reputation) 
-Exchange back to unfair money needs to be fair (transparency,​ reputation) +  ​- ​Coloring coins with different brightness based on fairpoints ​
-Coloring coins with different brightness based on fairpoints ​+
  
 ==== Bad (the dark cloud) ==== ==== Bad (the dark cloud) ====
- +  - Extractive, destructive behaviour (systemically encouraged) 
-Extractive, destructive behaviour (systemically encouraged) +  ​- ​Competitive (vs cooperative) 
-Competitive (vs cooperative) +  ​- ​Central bank money is a tool used and designed for evil, manipulative and enslaving aims 
-Central bank money is a tool used and designed for evil, manipulative and enslaving aims +  ​- ​"Time is money" (vs "money is time"​) 
-"Time is money" (vs "money is time"​) +  ​- ​Advertisement,​ dishonest and non-transparent propaganda, mind-control 
-Advertisement,​ dishonest and non-transparent propaganda, mind-control +  ​- ​Speciesism, racism, sexism, patriarchism,​ nationalism,​ regionalism,​ movementism,​ groupism, individualism 
-Speciesism, racism, sexism, patriarchism,​ nationalism,​ regionalism,​ movementism,​ groupism, individualism +  ​- ​Consumer attitude 
-Consumer attitude +  ​- ​Bureaucracy 
-Bureaucracy +  ​- ​Slavery, stealing, exploitation (synonymous) 
-Slavery, stealing, exploitation (synonymous) +  ​- ​Laws and enforcement
-Laws and enforcement+
  
 ==== Facts ==== ==== Facts ====
 +  - Lack of unfair money (although we could make a lot of it by participating in the unfair game)
 +  - The transformation requires transition time (it is slow)
 +  - It could suddenly go fast and we will need to be ready
 +  - The time plays against us because suddenly it could be too late
 +  - Getting local groups going economically is hard work, transformation is difficult to start, to manifest
 +  - If it is not fun, it is not sustainable
 +  - Joy is more powerful than fear
 +  - People come from different realities, necessity to stay pragmatic
  
-* Lack of unfair money (although we could make a lot of it by participating in the unfair game) +==== Problems ==== 
-* The transformation requires transition time (it is slow) +  - We have sparse contributors,​ sometimes not connected ​and work together well enough 
-* It could suddenly go fast and we will need to be ready +  - Some people participate with different motivations that are not synergetic 
-* The time plays against us because suddenly it could be too late +  - Challenge to get the PermFairEco ​going 
-* Getting local groups ​going economically is hard worktransformation is difficult to startto manifest +  - Consumerismsurveillance and blaming attitude of some peopleinstead of helping actively 
-* If it is not funit is not sustainable +  - FairEconomy onion is undefined and the onion layers lack defined meaning 
-* Joy is more powerful than fear +  - We have value flows that are not visible in the value network (FairMarketUseFairCoin in OCP) 
-* People come from different realities, necessity to stay pragmatic+  - No current consensus on the value of FairCoin
  
-==== Problems ​====+==== Exchange rate challenge ​==== 
 +  - Target a "​fairo"​ exchange rate that is 25-35% above market (long term future, not current market price) 
 +  - Increase circularity  
 +    * Shift mindset to needs 
 +    * Survey real needs of community and merchants 
 +    * Measure real needs (needlist and meta data) 
 +    * Work to include offers that match needs 
 +  - Getting back on a major exchange would be good, not bad 
 +  - Buy price, sell price as percentage relative to Fairo 
 + 
 +==== Questions ==== 
 +  - When is money a good tool? 
 +  - How do we make tools more used and usable, user orientated?​ 
 +  - Which tools do we (really) need and in which order/​priority?​ 
 +  - How to most efficiently connect offers and needs in the permFairEco?​ 
 +  - Is FairCoop the core of the onion or the whole onion, accepting that people are at the layer where they are? 
 +  - How do we make FairCoop "​productive"​ in the sense that we can provide for a good livelihood?
  
-* We have sparse contributors,​ sometimes not connected and work together well enough +==== Solutions ==== 
-* Some people participate with different motivations ​that are not synergetic +  - Fair satellite projects ​that contract contributors in the fair value network 
-* Challenge to get the PermFairEco going +  - Fair satellites should be able to make shallower ​and deeper use of OCP 
-* Consumerism,​ surveillance ​and blaming attitude ​of some people, instead of helping actively +  - Team and/or website ​that would function as sales for this "​ecosystem as a service"​ 
-* FairEconomy onion is undefined ​and the onion layers lack defined meaning +  - Upvote / downvote for prioritisation, ​in the spirit of governancesee "Good 13" 
-* We have value flows that are not visible ​in the value network (FairMarketUseFairCoin ​--> OCP) +  ​Develop FairAcademy to improve FairSkills in the ecosystem 
-* No current consensus ​on the value of FairCoin+  - Workshop ​on video tutorial production later in the hackathon 
 +  - We need a good sysadmin team and clean hosting infrastructure 
 +  - Open calls for mentoring, onboarding to develop and maintain apps 
 +  - More direct bounties again for achieving milestones
  
 +==== Concerns ====
 +  - Complexity of OCP, unfinishedness
 +  - How to prevent tasks from being taken without delivering on time (means tasks need to be small enough)
 +  - How do we best balance the freedom to choose what to work on and the coordination for priorities for the common good
 +  - Risk sensitivity of OCP due to transacting directly on the blockchain
 +  - How can we trust the fairness of current and future FairCoin accumulation
 +  - Need to update OCP to Python 3
  
 +==== Inventory ====
 +  - Global community of like-minded people
 +  - Open software and people that can put it to use
 +  - Intersection of our different independent projects, leveraging synergies
 +  - There are a lot of FairCoins around that could be spent, invested into fair economy projects as long as they would not end up getting exchanged to fiat